Electrolysis

 

Electrolytic reactions are non-spontaneous reactions that are run by the surrounding doing work on the system (DG>0 and DG= minimum work needed to make the non-spontaneous reaction run forward.  The backward spontaneous reaction has a certain potential that is greater than zero.  The forward reaction has a potential less than zero.  As an example say the forward reaction has a potential, E = -2 V.  By using an externally supplied voltage greater than +2 V, we can get the non-spontaneous reaction to go forward.  The reaction is run in electrolytic cells.  These reactions go the opposite direction as a voltaic reaction.

 

Using the table of standard reduction potentials, we said that the half-reaction with the greater reduction potential will go from left to right, and substances with lower reductions potentials will be oxidized (their reduction half-rxn will go backward, from right to left).

 

i.e.,                  Higher Reduction Potential ®

Lower Reduction Potential               ¬

EMF = Ered, cathode – Ered, anode > 0 (Thus DG<0, and the reaction is product favored)

 

For an electrolytic reaction this reaction will be reversed

 

            Higher Reduction Potential ¬

Lower Reduction Potential               ®

 

EMF < 0 (Thus DG>0.  This reactant favored reaction will be run by the surrounding working on the system.)

 

Electrolysis of NaCl – Based on the table of reduction potentials, we predict that chlorine will react with sodium metal.  The chlorine will be reduced and the sodium will be oxidized in this spontaneous reaction making sodium chloride.

 

 

red (V)

Cl2 (g) + 2e-     ®

2 Cl- (aq)

1.36 V

Na+ (aq) + e-   ®

Na (s)

-2.71 V

 

            Net Reaction: Cl2 (g) + 2Na (s) + 2 e- ® 2 NaCl (s) + 2 e-

 

Using an electrolytic cell we can run the reverse reaction, reacting sodium chloride to make sodium metal and chlorine gas.  Solid sodium chloride does not conduct electricity since the ions are fixed in their crystal lattice.  So we need liquid sodium chloride to conduct an electric current.  CaCl2 is typically added to lower the melting point from 802°C to around 600ºC (remember how we added a solute to lower the freezing point of water). 

 

            2 Cl-    (L)       ® Cl2 (g) + 2 e-          Ered° ~ +1.36 V *Oxidation (Anode)

 

            Na+ (L)+ e-     ® Na(L)                     Ered° ~ -2.71 V *Reduction (Cathode)

 

Net Rxn 2 Na+ + 2 Cl- + 2 e- ® 2 Na(L) + Cl2 (g)

 

E°= -2.71 – (-1.36) V = -4.07 V *

 

DGº = nFEº = 785 kJ, So we need to do over 785 kJ of work to run this non-spontaneous reaction.

 *We should treat these potentials as estimates since they are taken from half-reactions in liquid water under standard conditions, and we are far from standard conditions.

 

As a voltaic cell, the reaction of sodium and chlorine producing sodium chloride would produce 4.07 V (at standard conditions).  To run the reaction producing sodium and chlorine, we would have to apply a DC potential greater than this in the reverse direction.  If we have an adjustable voltage supply and a meter measuring current (flow of electrical charge such as electrons) as we slowly increased the voltage, we would have zero current until we got to -4.07 V.  When we got to -4.07 V, we would suddenly get a flow of current and the reaction would turn on.  We could not increase the voltage greater than -4.07 V.

 

Applications of Electrolysis

The reduction of water to hydrogen and hydroxide has a higher reduction potential than Al3+.  If we tried to use electrolysis to reduce aluminum, water would be reduced instead because it is easier.  Since we cannot use an aqueous solution to reduce aluminum, we could use the molten refined product from bauxite, the aluminum ore.  Refining bauxite, leaves Al2O3.  The problem with electrolysis of Al2O3 is its melting point is > 2000° C which is hard to handle.  In 1886 Charles Hall of the US and Paul Heroult of France (both were 21) discovered that aluminum oxide will dissolve in liquid cryolite (Na3AlF6, m.p. 1012°C) which will conduct electricity.  The electrolysis reaction is

 

            4 X      Al+3 + 3 e-                   ® Al (L)                      (Cathode, reduction)

            3X       C (s) + 2 O2-               ® CO2 + 4 e-             (Anode, oxidation)

            4 Al+3 + 3 C + 6 O2-    + 12 e- ® 4 Al (L) + 3 CO2 + 12 e-

 

Graphite electrodes are used for the anode, and the oxygen from the molten Al2O3 reacts with the graphite to produce carbon dioxide.

 

~2% of all US electrical power is used to produce Al.  Recycling saves 91 % of this.

 

Electrolysis is used to produce Al, Mg, Na, Cl2, NaOH, and purify Cu (with Ag, Au, and Pt byproducts!).

 

Electrolysis of aqueous NaF at 25°C      

 

Ionic substances have high melting points, so could we do electrolysis in an aqueous solution at a more reasonable temperature?  With water present, we have it as a possible reactant along with H+, OH- and O2.  Remember, the greater the reduction potential the more likely a substance will be reduced.  And the greater the reduction potential, the less likely the reduced form will be oxidized.  First we will consider electrolysis of a NaF solution, then a NaCl solution.  Remember, electrolysis reactions run the opposite direction as a voltaic cell, so substance on the lower left of our reduction potential table will be reduced, and the substance on the upper right will be oxidized.


 

 

 

red / V

F2     +   2 e-             ®

2 F- (aq)

2.87

Cl2    +   2 e-             ®

2 Cl- (aq)

1.36

O2    +   4 H+ + 4 e- ®

2 H2O (L)

 1.23

Cu2+ +    2 e-            ®

Cu (s)

  .34

Ni2+  +    2 e-            ®

Ni (s)

 -.28

2 H2O + 2 e-            ®

H2 + 2 OH-

 -.83

Al3+  +   3 e-            ®

Al (s)

-1.66

Na+   +    e-              ®

Na (s)

-2.71

 

Consider electrolysis of an aqueous NaF solution. 

At the anode the possible oxidation reactions are. (Note, I am writing the reduction half-reaction backward)

 

            2 F-      ® F2 + 2 e-                                        Ered°= 2.87 V

            2 H2O ® O2 + 4 H+ + 4 e-                            Ered°=1.23 V Easier to oxidize

 

The second half reaction is more favorable (from thermodynamics) because the greater the reduction potential, the less likely the reduced form (F- and H2O) will be oxidized. 

 

At the cathode the possible reduction reactions are

 

2 H2O + 2 e-  ® H2 (g) + 2 OH-                    -.83 V  Easier to reduce

            Na+ + e-          ® Na                                      -2.71 V

 

Water is easier to reduce than sodium, and this is what is observed.

 

So looking at the table above, half reactions above the top blue line in italic print at 1.23 V are substances harder to oxidize than water, and so it is more likely thermodynamically that water will be oxidized.  Half reactions below the lower blue line in italic print at -0.83 V are harder to reduce than water, and so are less likely thermodynamically to be reduced.  This is why we could not electrolytically reduce aluminum in water, we would just make hydrogen instead.

 

So, for electrolysis of an aqueous NaF solution, the net reaction will be

 

             4 H2O + 4 e- ® 2H2 (g) + 4 OH-                  -.83 V  (Cathode reduction)

             2 H2O             ® O2 + 4 H+ + 4 e-                1.23 V  (Anode oxidation)

            6 H2O + 4 e-   ® 2 H2+O2+ 4H+ + 4OH- + 4e-       

 

E°(cell) = -.83 - 1.23 = -2.06 V

 

The hydrogen ion and hydroxide products can combine to produce 4 waters to have a net reaction of 2 moles of water producing 2 moles of hydrogen and 1 mole of oxygen.  The volume of oxygen will be half of the hydrogen produced.  This supports Avogadro’s hypothesis about equal volumes of gas having equal number of particles, and it supports the formula of water having twice as many hydrogen particles as oxygen particles.  So we will need an external D.C. power supply will a voltage greater than 2.06 V to run this non-spontaneous reaction.

 

If we used NaCl instead of NaF, we would still reduce water to make hydrogen but at the anode the choice is

           

            2 Cl-                 ® Cl2 + 2 e-              red = +1.36 V

            2 H2O  ® O2 + 4 H+ + 4 e-               red = +1.23 V 

 

The second reaction is favored thermodynamically, but at high Cl- concentrations the first reaction happens (the Cl oxidation is favored kinetically).  So the first half reaction has a lower activation energy but the change in Gibbs free energy is not as large a negative number as the second reaction.  So the first half-reaction is not as exergonic as the second.  So the net reaction observed is

 

             2 Cl-               ® Cl2 + 2 e-               1.36 V    (Anode oxidation)

            4 H2O + 4 e-   ® 2H2 (g) + 4 OH-     -.83 V  (Cathode reduction)

            4 Cl- + 4 H2O + 4e-     ® 2 H2 + 4 OH- + Cl2(g)  Net Ionic Equation         

 

E°(cell) = -.83V – 1.36V = -2.19 V

The molecular equation would be  

 

4 NaCl + 4 H2O + 4e-                ® 2 H2 + 4 NaOH + Cl2(g)

 

This is the net reaction using sodium chloride and water, both ready available, to produce the important commercial products hydrogen, chlorine, and sodium hydroxide.  

 

Aqueous Electrolysis

1. Neglecting exceptions like the chlorine mentioned above, metals cations and other substances with a reduction potential greater than -0.8 V, (the reduction potential for reduction of water to H2 and OH-) will be reduced during electrolysis in water.  This includes metals such as Zn, Fe, Ni, and Ag, but does not include Al, Mg, and Na. 

            2. Species with an reduction potential less than 1.2 V, (the reduction potential for the oxidation of water to O2 and H+) will be oxidized in aqueous electrolysis.  An reduction potential less than 1.2 V is equivalent to saying an oxidation potential greater than  -1.2 V. 

            The net of the above statements is species dissolved in water between with reduction potentials between 1.2 V and -0.8 V can be reduced and oxidized in water.  If either species potential exceeds these limits, water will react instead.

 

Electrolysis with Active Electrodes - Electroplating

 

            e.g. Ni has a reduction potential between 1.2 and -0.8 V, so we can oxidize Ni at one electrode and reduce the Ni+2 at the other.  So two Ni electrodes in a NiSO4 solution will react with one reducing Ni+2 and the other oxidizing Ni metal.  This can be used to put a protective or decorative coating of, for example Ni, Au, or Ag on a cheaper, more easily oxidized metal.  Typically, electroplating is used to produce thin films from 0.03-.05 mm thick (30-50 mm).

 

            Ni+2 + 2 e-       ® Ni                                       E°= -.28 V (Cathode, reduction)

Ni                    ® Ni+2 + 2 e-                          E°= -.28 V (Anode, oxidation)

No net reaction and E°=0

1 mole of Ni will be deposited when 2 moles of electrons flow through the circuit.

 

Electroplating is used to purify copper by oxidizing if from an impure anode and reducing it on a cathode (page 928-929 from 9th Edition, BLB).  Less active metals such as gold and platinum drop off of the impure anode and are collected as valuable sludge in the bottom of the electrolysis cell.  More active metals such as lead and zinc are oxidized from the anode but are not reduced on the cathode, and so they stay in solution.

 

Electroplating of Ag and Au requires Ag(CN)2- and Au(CN)2+ in order to get a nice smooth metal film.  NiSO4 and H2CrO4 are used to plate Ni and Cr.  Note the electroplating of Ag and Au has killed people due to accidents producing HCN (g).

 

Stoichiometry of Electrolysis

 

Electric current is measured in amps,  1 amp = 1A = 1 Coulomb of charge / sec

or 1A s = 1 C

Faraday’s Constant  1 F = 96,500 C / mol of charge  converts moles of electrons to Coulombs (A s)

 

Example 1. Say I run 1.0 amp through a Ni platting bath for 30.00 minutes (1800. sec).  What mass of Ni plates out?  Two electrons are needed to reduce Ni2+ cations to nickel metal. 

 

1800. sec  X  1.0 A   X 1 C    X 1 mol e-   X   1 mol Ni  X  58.69 g Ni  =  .547 g Ni

                                       A s         96,500 C        2 mol e-       mol Ni

 

Example 2. How many minutes will it take 10.0 A to deposit 3.00 g of Au from Au(CN)2+?   (7.3 minutes)

 

Example3 .  Often you want some thickness.  A problem might give you a current to use and a thickness and surface area, and ask the time needed to deposit that thickness.  Given a current and a thickness and surface area, calculate a time you would need to calculate a volume to be deposited and given a density, you could calculate a mass of metal and then calculate everything else.

 

Electrical Work

 

Remember DG = w, so if DG<0, then work is done on the surroundings by a spontaneous reaction, and if DG>0, then the surrounding do work on the system.

We have seen

            DG = -nFE, so if E>0, the process is spontaneous and the system does work on the surroundings.

Power is defined as energy per unit time, and the unit of power is a Watt (W), so 1W = 1J/s.  Electrical work is usually expressed as watt seconds = J.  A kilowatt hour is 1000 watts X 1 hour (3600s) = 3.6 X 106 J.  Also remember that a

            1V = J/C and  1C = 1As

 

So       VC = VAs = J.

 

A recent power bill from MID said I’m using about 14 KWh/day and I’m being charged $.0649 $0.0881/ KWh.  So we can calculate the cost of electrolysis.

 

Sample Exercise 20.18 (page 818 (page 792 from BLB 8th Edition), I don’t like the way they work it so I will do it my equivalent way)

Calculate the KWh and the cost of producing 1000 kg of Al from Al+3 electrolysis using a EMF of 4.50 V.

 

1000 kg  X  1000g Al   X   1 mol Al    X  3 mol e-  X   96500 As = 1.07 X 1010 As

                          1 kg           26.98 g Al     1 mol Al        1 mol e-

 

            1.07 X 1010 As    X   4.50 V   X  1 KWh        =    1.32 X 104 KWh

                                                                 3.6 X 10J

 

            The cost would be $0.0881 $.0649   X 1.32 X 104 KWh  =  $ 1163. 857

                                             1 KWh

 

As BLB notes, this electrolysis process is only 40 % efficient, so the process would cost 2.5 times more (100/40).  There are also the added cost of mining the Al ore, initial processing, shipping, clean up, heating the ore to melt it, and then this electrolysis.  Remember above I said that recycling aluminum saves about 91% of the production cost.  Aluminum metal has a lower melting point and we don’t need to reduce it.  Impurities are added to produce certain properties, so recycling may involve purification or the aluminum or a limitation on the uses of the metal.  For example recycled aluminum cans might be limited to use as aluminum cans.